Tuesday, 12 May 2015

Notes of the 6 May session

C. (CC.) Religion: VII. Religion: A. Natural religion & B. Religion in the form of art (410-453)
Wednesday, 6 May 2015 (notes by Marton Ribary)

The link between religion and art:

Hegel links the first two shapes of religion, that is, natural religion and religion in the form of art by the person who performs the deed uniting form and matter. The artificer (Werkmeister) is a superhuman person who performs the embodiment of the idea and creates the tangible world in the shape of natural religion. Hegel’s description and terminology fits the demiurge of Greek (and later Gnostic) thought where the demiurge is not the ultimate Godhead, but simply the performer of creation.

The same creative power is accredited to the artist. In the shape of the religion of art, the demiurge’s creative power has become self-conscious in the person of the artist. The power to unite the two equal manifestations of the Spirit, namely matter and from, are no longer external, but possessed by the Spirit who becomes self-conscious in the person of the artist.

The self-discovery of the artist:

As Hegel describes in §§708-710, the Spirit gradually discovers itself in the person of the artist, it eventually becomes self-conscious. (1) The anonymous creator of the artwork is yet to realise the relevance of the creative deed which has united the two equal manifestations of the Spirit, that is, the matter and the form. (2) By the admiration the artwork attracts from an audience, the artist realises that s/he has created an embodied idea which has independent existence. Thereby the Spirit recognises itself in the artwork and becomes self-conscious of its own creative power. The artwork is an external manifestation of the Spirit which has yet to return to the person of the artist so that the self-consciousness of the Spirit become individual and immediately present. (3) According to Hegel, the return of the Spirit to itself (from the artwork to the person of the artist) is realised by language which enables a higher form of self-consciousness in which the creative power of the Spirit is immediately accessible to itself and retained in its own person.

The temporal shapes of religion:

In our usual fashion, we made our way backwards in Hegel’s exposition. In §683, Hegel describes three temporal shapes of religion which are distinguished from each other according to the Spirit’s journey of self-discovery. (1) In natural religion, “Spirit knows itself as its object in a natural or immediate shape”, and therefore “Spirit in general is in the form of consciousness”. (2) In the religion of art, “Spirit knows itself in the shape of a superseded natural existence”, and therefore Spirit in general is in the form “of self-consciousness”. (3) In revealed religion, Spirit overcomes the one-sidedness of the previous two shapes, and realises the unity of consciousness and self-consciousness. “The self is just as much an immediacy, as the immediacy is the self.”

Beyond the shapes of religion:

However, Hegel adds that even though “Spirit has indeed attained its true shape” in revealed religion, the shape and the accompanying picture-thought (Vorstellung) are yet to be superseded so that Spirit may reach the Notion (Begriff) “which equally embraces its own opposite”. (§683) The final stage of the Spirit’s journey which is beyond the shapes of religion, and beyond any shapes for that matter, is presumably what Hegel calls “Absolute Knowing” in the concluding part of the Phenomenology.

The definition of religion:


Hegel’s understanding of religion is different from the common use of the word. Religion is defined as “the perfection of Spirit into which its individual moments – consciousness, self-consciousness, Reason, and Spirit – return … The genesis of religion in general is contained in the movement of the universal moments.” (§680) Contrary to science which maintains a sharp division between the observing “I” and the observed “object”, religion supersedes the division and allows the Spirit’s self-discovery.

193 - World by philosophers: Hegel and  walk I Frame Hegel presents situation  II Frame Inscription: How it is supposed to be Person walks   III Frame Inscription: How it is by Hegel Galaxy walks  Starring: Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Walker

Tuesday, 5 May 2015

Notes of the 22 April 2015 session

C. (BB.) Spirit: VI. Spirit: C. Spirit that is certain of itself. Morality (364-409)
Wednesday, 22 April 2015 (notes by Marton Ribary)

Only the movement is real:

Hegel’s dialectical method has demonstrated that whatever is treated as stable will necessarily destabilise itself by having been contrasted with its opposite. The dialectical movement of reflection allows no room for the so-called “eternal truth” that philosophy has been chasing for too long. Inasmuch as thought is treated as a single, solid and stable piece of knowledge, it becomes immediately fragile to challenges. Only the movement is real, and therefore only the constant progress from one form to another can hold the claim to be true.

The reality of thoughts:

Consequently, contrary to the long-standing philosophical dogma, inasmuch as a thought is true, it must be real, inasmuch it is real, it must be moving and alive. They are not the eternal Platonic entities that mortal humans occasionally take part of when they have reached an advanced level of philosophical reflection. The age old contradistinction between mortal humans and immortal thoughts is a mistake – mortals do not borrow immortal ideas when they think. What I think here and now is not the same what Plato thought 2400 years ago. In short, there is no such thing as philosophia perennis (and thereby a good part of contemporary analytic philosophy is following a dead-end.) Just as humans are born, live and die, thoughts are living entities too.

The empty nature of morality:

In the previous section, Hegel has demonstrated with strong allusions to the French Revolution that absolute freedom is empty and eventually devours itself. He moves on to discuss whether morality can be used as a reference point for our conduct, and concludes that all externally set rules are empty and meaningless. Set rules destabilise themselves because what is treated as solid and unchanged falls victim to dialectical reflection. Moral standards set by another consciousness (God, society, the perfect law-giver, Kant’s formal rules etc.) turn out to be empty and meaningless, because they are dead and do not move forward, and because they are outside the consciousness (the “I”) who is supposed to follow them.

The acting conscience:


Internalised, dynamic and self-constituted standards seem to be the solution for the problem of human conduct. In what Hegel calls “duty”, conscience serves as the force of human action. Just as set standards turn into their opposite by dialectical reflection, abstaining from action and thereby creating a moral zero is similarly static and self-destroying. The “beautiful soul’s” solution to the moral conundrum of action eventually leads nowhere. By overcoming the self-destroying character of static standards of conduct, acting conscience (that is, duty) is capable of moving towards self-realisation without turning into its opposite and eliminating itself in the process. The key is that self-realisation is not achieved by reaching a set target or by living a perfectly moral life, but by being recognised by another consciousness. The acting conscience realises itself by being recognised by another.


96- System of knowledge I Frame. Kartezjusz: FOR A WHILE WE WILL LEAVE HERE, IN THIS MISERABLE, WRETCHED SHED OF BASIC ASSUMPTIONS AND THEORIES. BUT THANKS TO THAT ... II Frame Kartezjusz: ..WE'LL BUILD IMPRESSIVE STRUCTURE, SYSTEM OF KNOWLEDGE WITH INEVITABLE ASSERTIONS AND UNQUESTIONABLE THEORIES... III Frame Hegel ale nie widać tego na pewno bo widzimy go z baaardzo daleka: I'VE BEEN SAYING FROM THE VERY BEGINNING THAT THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE... Starring: Rene Descartes, Immanuel Kant, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Benedict Spinoza